My
transition from fundamentalist to non-theist took place in five
realizations: 1. Faith is a blatantly self-serving double standard when
used for knowledge -- instead it can only lead to actions, never
knowledge. In this respect it is no different from courage, optimism or
a coin toss. 2. All second-hand testimony must be held accountable to
first-hand observations. 3. All experiences requiring God for an
explanation are second-hand testimony from those who are not alive to
question. 4. A believer has to do all the work reinterpreting their
experiences to see god interact with them, they give God all the credit
for it and take all the blame when they don't see him. 5. Therefore the
modern, sophisticated use of god-language is empty of informational
content. The hypothesis of God's interaction with us is therefore empty
of practical implications. Superfluous God is a contradiction in
terms. Case closed.
I grew up
the eldest son of a fire-and-brimstone preaching Baptist pastor. It was
a childhood of tent revivals, horror movies about the "rapture," and
winning first place for bible memorization in Vacation Bible School.
Frequently I would lie awake at night wondering why I was not
experiencing and becoming what a true bible-believer is supposed to be.
I envisioned a 50-foot tall Jesus parting the clouds and taking away
everybody I loved, leaving me behind. He was like Godzilla, only real.
Instead of
attending an animation school and pursuing my dreams, I believed it was
God's will that I get a useless art degree at Pensacola Christian
College in Florida, a school so rigidly fundamentalist that it calls Bob
Jones University compromising liberals.
During
this time I had an insatiable appetite for reading and debating
Christian apologetics. Ironically, I believe this was the root of my
eventual apostasy! Through it I got God's permission to regard reason as
an ally, not an enemy. I started spouting about how those secularists
need to become objective and see the evidence of creation science,
fulfilled prophecy and the historical evidence for a literal
resurrection. But shouting "bias" is a double-edged sword because the
bible teaches faith. I could no longer in good conscience use faith as a
blatantly self-serving double standard, and I didn't want to be a
hypocrite that way.
The actual
Christian life, however, was problematic. Ironically I lost my faith in
God because I really was sincere about it. It is only possible to remain
a Christian by lowering one's expectations of the supposed omnipotent
deity until a potted plant could pass them. I expected him to act like
God and instead he had a suspicious tendency to act just like I would
expect from his complete nonexistence. I noticed that the devotional
program and state of mind prescribed in the bible was in fact perfectly
adapted to the purpose of getting people to believe God exists even if
it is not true. I became self-aware enough to suspect that I was
generating a "personal relationship" with Jesus through mental
sleight-of-hand. Once I started noticing how I was doing it, the
illusion no longer functioned.
All the
experiences for which we needed God for an explanation were pushed off
to the ancient past (such as creation or other supposed miracles) and
the indeterminate future (such as the "rapture"). It is just too fishy
that we are to expect nothing within the lifetimes of anyone alive to
question. I also noticed how heavily the cosmological argument of first
cause relied on pure a-priori deduction, which seemed weak when I began
to have to make up ad-hoc hypotheses to exempt the hypothesis from
accountability to be corroborated or falsified.
I
continued in a disillusioned state for a few years laboring under the
assumption that non-theism entailed nihilism and existential despair.
Then I read the story of Carl Sagan's death written by Ann Druyan. At
that moment the emotional impediments began to fall away. To my shame it
was only then that I began a serious investigation of non-supernatural
alternatives. I discovered counter-apologetics existed and was
devastatingly effective against all a Christian apologist's second-hand
testimony and forensics.
Matthew
Arnold is a desktop publisher. He moderates
The Electric Monk,
a
discussion board and weblog on worldviews. Matt lives north of Detroit,
Michigan. His personal website is
http://www.geocities.com/nemorathwald/.